| Performance |
    |
| Appearance |
    |
| Value |
   |
| Reviewed By : phillip stafford
|
|
| Date: 02/19/2008 |
| Testimonial: |
| We are using this to visualize cells on a laser scanner. The additional 405 laser for the scanner would be >$30,000. This laser will essentially provide the same resolution at 1/10 the price. |
| Pros: |
| Good power output, stable, well made, reasonable power consumption, 405 output is dead-on with very little UV and little scatter |
| Cons: |
| large unfocused spot, batteries are pricey, expensive but for 405nm there is no solid state alternative |
|